" ... we can show the better way exists." -Bob Dratch

```
kick'em in the teeth/repairing a damaged mind

The Bio-Information Age is now here
http://bob-dratch.org/talk.htm

"-Over the last 25 years totally silent and very effective wireless neuro-stimulator technology has been developed - in essence, a phenomenally precise nervous system control method is here now. It will eventually cover the Globe.

In reading that statement, I ask you, did you feel that would be a negative outcome or a positive outcome? That question touches on the exact issue we are about to discuss. Please follow along with me.

Throughout this article I will touch on both sides, both viewpoints. You can choose which side of the fence you are on. Possibly after reading this, you may feel that there is hope and a better future is on the horizon ....

-In researching over the last 100 years the "progress" in the field of using technology for controlling behaviour, I will predict that neural control concepts are not going to go away, and if kept in the dark, they will become more insidious. To remove the dark potential, we need to discuss what is happening, and then offer solutions, if at all possible.

Let's start with a look at the conventional kick'em in the teeth-approach, that the militaries choose to keep a situation under control.

Developed in the United States for the military, high powered not-so-subtle, brute force aggressive RF "microwavers" (think portable microwave oven), such as Active Denial designed by companies such as Raytheon for the US Government, rely on projecting energy that cooks the surface layer of skin cells, creating intense pain and discomfort. The "cookers" as they can be called, can't create any helpful situation in the body, or mind. They simply mitigate, by showering one with painful "electronic bullets". That technology is discussed on GlobalSecurity.org - they suggest that even metal garbage can lids will effectively deflect away any energy rendering the "amazing" deterrent aspect ludicrous. It has been said that the Active Denial system is a benign "non-lethal" weapons system.

Calling those premiere microwave cookers "non-lethal-weapon systems" as the "ultimate deterrent system" for governments worldwide looks like a marketing ploy - the effects of ultra-high-frequency "submillimeter" microwave "cookers" can be easily shielded by a person wearing a conductive skin suit, such as silver coated Spandex.

Silverized goggles also would protect the eyes. "Silverlon™" is one such brand name of a material that will adequately shield a person. Incorporating conductive shielding into conventional infantry clothes is easy to do.

The logic of the cookers says HURT but don't kill. They want these to be used everywhere for quelling conflicts. (well they assume it won't injure or blind..)

-The neural battleground -
Over the last 25 years exploring energy and consciousness, I've looked into published research of beneficial uses of neural technologies for actually helping to restore neural functionality, help with motor control, or achieving feelings of wellness - it is clear to me that one can achieve peace, stability and security through repairing a damaged mind and body. Don't ignore this fact.

There are others I have seen who have designed nasty technologies under the label of the "non-lethal" heading. Their mindset is not about healing or helping the person, as their mindset is about winning the battle. With them it's always a battle, an "Us against them..", never do we see a potential for we, or cooperation.

We can ask ourselves "Peace yes, but at what cost?" The implication reflects to the sovereignty of the State, the individual and of course what will happen in the economy when global stability becomes a reality. The economy actually will become stronger and we will see amazing advances in global market cooperation, diversity of product manufacturing and expansion through third world markets. To see the benefits happen, one needs to follow through with the proper POSITIVE aspects of the technology. Haven't we seen those in control believe negative reinforcement, or "use a bigger stick" is a better way?

We often hear: "we need to love one another more.."and just trust. When attempting to reach folks and say: "Well your prayer has been achieved", and it can truly happen now, I've seen these folks go reactive literally in fear that something bad will happen! That type of behaviour reaction is because of particular neural circuits blocking them from allowing the realization of an optimum outcome. These folks needing help just can't trust, or of all things, have "faith" that there can be a positive outcome. Those folks are experiencing "conflict circuits" and are what the "negative controllers" use to keep them in bondage. It is amazingly insidious. The folks who would be healed refuse to be healed because of the installed blocks - (either such was self installed, or installed in some other manner). It is tragic really - the solutions have been there, and they won't use them, nor have "faith". When you see people blocking or refusing a positive outcome, take a very close look at their issues. One may become very enlightened at how the "system" works.. The conflict circuits safely and easily can be cleared out.

What about creating beauty? What about creating ugly smelly disgusting appearances in one's clothing, or not bathing - aren't those statements and like-wise forms of mind control? Why should a technologist utilizing a way to make a statement, or an artist using a way to make a statement, or a hippie, or a bum be chastised or rejected as non-conformist? Each of those groups or persons is using a form of mind control to create and/or influence those about one. Look at the quantity of afternoon "soaps", or conflict/competition or "talk shows" that are continually being presented, and the amount of engagement that those "shows" present - what we see happening is a tacit agreement that type of mind control is OK as long as it falls within certain peer group parameters. So, the defining of what is to be considered socially acceptable, or positive, and socially not acceptable or negative is a strong consideration. Mind control clearly is used by everyone - seems we only get scared or annoyed or worried if it is used by something "big", like "the Man", or "big business". The worry really comes from "negative control".

>To not let people know there are solutions is unethical

Again, it is clear to me that one can achieve peace, stability and security through repairing a damaged mind, and often-times when the mind is healed the body will try to comply as well. Understanding "damage" can point towards solutions. Heal the mind and the rest will follow if our educational system and value system is properly defined. People need to know there are positive solutions available. To not get that reality to the people is a disservice I feel. It has been shown time and time again, when the mind is healed, the body will follow.

-Within the current state-of-the-art of Neural Holographic technology, there are methods that can correct, shield and help get people relief of symptoms from whomever is actively using controlling technology in negative ways - we can only speculate which groups or Countries are behind negative control. I believe one could call amelioration techniques "counter-measures". It seems to me that a Neural Pacer Device would be a viable solution. Why would we allow negative control to run rampant?
Counter-measures, based on functionally similar but appropriately "positively" configured technology, I feel, are the only solution to addressing when one's nervous system comes under assault. So, it seems, there can be a silver lining to any dark clouds. We need to be educated. That means discussing these topics out in the open and SHOWING that solutions are possible. To not let people know about the positive aspects and solutions only allows the negative aspects to keep people in fear.

I know there are ways to help stay in happiness and beauty - more of the story is available when time permits. Believe with me that we all can have faith to understand, that we can all do it right and reach a higher level of consciousness. I feel we can have access to the appropriate technology and skill needed and I believe-we can show the better way exists." -Bob Dratch

_______________________________________________________________
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

There is no way to peace; peace is the way. ~ A.J. Muste.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Peace

Peace is not the absence of conflict but the presence of creative alternatives for responding to conflict — alternatives to passive or aggressive responses, alternatives to violence. -Dorothy Thompson.

Peace will come wherever it is sincerely invited. -Alice Walker.