The Creators of Money

I found this insightful article in the Divine Cosmos messageboard (David Wilcocks's site) Would love to hear any feedback on it.
Note: this is pretty long.

Creators of Money, pt 1

That Eleusinian-based text on money was, indeed, very good in David's "Deeper Secret", pt III.

Firstly there is very little modern-day history of a widely-used printed currency--known as "money"--that comes without interest or usury; the only countries in the world that uses usury-free money are: Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba and Libya. Do you notice something in common amongst those five countries? They all are declared "enemies" of the USA, INC and several are on the so-called "Axis of Evil" list.

In this two-part post, I wish to show that it is the interest/usury aspect that is attached to money that is the key source of the misery that is frequently associated with money. Ideally, printed money ought to be neutral, but the reality is that the vast majority of printed, modern-day money is anything BUT a neutral means of exchange. Printed money as we know it is not neutral--it never has been, with the exception of the aforementioned 5 countries. It's not to say that gold/silver, which is specie that has *intrinsic value*, has always been handled with wisdom and kindness, but, with the advent of printed money, the ease of the creation/distribution of wealth really *SHOULD* have been far, far easier with more and more people having wealth, rather than the widely-observed phenomenon of the wealthy few gaining more and more wealth for themselves at the expense of everyone else. This is a world-wide phenomenon, even in the few countries that have usury-free money.

Here's a couple of quotes:

...from "The Deeper Secret, pt III:

"Kindness is the foundation of all good; avarice the source of all evil." Chinese

...from history:

"Let me issue and control a nation's currency and I care not who creates the laws." N.M. Rothschild

A small bit of history of money and it's creation is in order here. Money had its start as "traveler's checks" by those who wished to travel without the risk of carrying gold/silver on hand, so the travelers deposited gold/silver with the Knights of Templar ("KT"--who were the precursors to the Jesuits, secret societies and banking societies), who released the gold/silver back to the travelers who had completed their travels--minus a fee, of course. The merchants who received the traveler's checks sent the checks to the KT and received the measured gold/silver in exchange, minus another fee, of course. Travelers who died while traveling presented windfalls of wealth for the KT, who naturally used the gold/silver specie to further their wealth by loaning it out with interest/usury; the KT soon found out that they could loan out many times the value of the stored gold/silver as long as they had the confidence of the public in their debt-based notes and this was the start of the fractional-reserve banking system that would play a key role in the development of the modern-day fiat/debt/interest/usury-based monetary systems. From the Middle-Ages on, there was quite a thriving banking industry in Europe with many players (mostly various kingdoms), but most of it dates back to the KT traveler's checks that were widely recognized and accepted.

Gold/silver was the most widely accepted specie for exchanges of goods and services. As the economies started to speed up and exchange more, people started to accept warehouse receipts in lieu of the physical gold/silver and this was the next step in the development of the fractional-reserve banking systems, as the warehouse receipt makers realized--like the KT discovered--that they could make more warehouse receipts than there were gold/silver deposits...as long as they had the confidence of the public; hence the deception of the public in the hiding the real truth behind money was of utmost importance.

Then the Rothschilds--who were known then as the "Bauers", who were decendents of the Khazar Jews--entered the stage through the hard work and industry of a one Nathan Meyer Rothschild (note the "N.M. Rothschild quote above), who was born poor and who used the catalyst of being poor to never be poor again. N. M. Rothschild was a genius in banking and he was able to work his way up the banking positions of power, yet he was just a player amongst powerful banking players playing the profitable game of interest/usury-bearing money (that was based on the KT traveler's checks model) that greatly enriched the bankers/kingdoms at the expense of the surrounding populations, most of whom were woefully under-educated and could not see the scam that the interest/usury-based money really was, much less read anything printed.

It was a moment of history of the defeat of Napoleon--a defeat that was unknown to the English world as of yet, but was known by N.M. Rothschild, thanks to his superior means of communication and information-sharing network--that Rothschild was able to influence the direction of the massive selling-off of British banking stock in such a way that the traders interpreted Rothschild's actions as to mean that Wellington had lost, rather than Napoleon, so there was a wave after wave of panic selling of English banking stock. Then near the end of the day, Rothschild quietly put out bids to buy up English banking stock for mere pennies on the pound to the point that he had full control of the English banking system...then the news came in the next day that it was Napoleon who lost at Waterloo, not Wellington, hence the English banking stock rose rapidly back up to previous levels and even exceeded those levels. N. M. Rothschild made over a BILLION pounds that one day. This is a billion in 1700's Pounds, dear reader. A lotta money. From then on the Rothschilds were the prime lords of the banking industry in the entirety of Europe...and they still are today here in our modern world that is full of wars, market crashes and avarice-based creations of wealth beyond measure for those who profit handsomely from the ignorance of the under-educated masses of people, most of whom have messed-up relations with money, materially and spiritually.

Most people think that today's money (I'll use the Federal Reserve Note, known as the "USD" as a central example) is a neutral measurement of goods/services that are exchanged today and that the money is created by the de jure (by law) government. Nothing can be further from the truth. Today's Federal Reserve Note is issued and controlled (note the Rothschild quote above) by a private corporation, the Federal Reserve, that is neither Federal, nor is it a Reserve; it is a corporation that is controlled by, guess who...the Rothschilds, no less. The Rothschilds are the wealthiest and most powerful financial family in the world today and has been so since 1815. They have brilliantly engineered a means of skimming wealth off from the backs of the people--like how the Mafia skims cash off casino winnings before taking the money to be deposited in banks, but it's much more than that--who naively believe that the money that they handle is a neutral measurement of value. Today's interest/usury-based money is anything BUT neutral; it has built-in avarice that benefits a super-wealthy few who are the creators ("primary creators") of the money at the expense of the majority of people ("secondary creators") who use the primary creators' money; the money created is in the Peoples' name, but the control of the money is completely out of the hands of the People and in the hands of the Rothschilds, the primary creators of the fiat-based money.

If modern-day money were to be created by, say, We the People, it would be totally devoid of usury/interest, which is the key source of the "avarice" mentioned in the above Chinese proverb. When the American Republic was born, there were a LOT of strong debates on how to manage the nation's money with Alexander Hamilton arguing for a strong, central bank (i.e. a privately-owned bank operated by the Rothschilds) as opposed to Thomas Jefferson, who would rather have had money be real gold/silver specie to be used as "units of account". Twice there was a central, private bank established in America and twice the charter was canceled by the Congress back then, with the first one being canceled in 1811.

Guess what happened in 1812--a war, the "War of 1812" and the real reason was the European-banker-financed armies had tried to do the war to re-establish the private banking interests in America, as well as other reasons, like the destruction of the original public records that were essential in the founding of the Republic, as well as the stopping of the Original 13th Amendment (Google " Original 13th Amendment ") so that the private, European bankers (back then the Rothschilds were mere players and not yet dominant) could deploy their Esquire agents in key positions at key times to gradually undermine the American Republic that was blissfully unaware of this infiltration.

[end of part 1; to be continued in part 2]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by Mozart; 04-03-2007 at 12:10 PM. Reason: Little fix-ups

Mozart
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Mozart
Find all posts by Mozart

#2 04-03-2007, 10:42 AM
Mozart
Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Earth, Sun, Alcyone Spiral Arm, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 172

Creators of Money, pt II

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Creators of Money, pt II

The European Esquire agents (Attorneys who had Titles of Nobility) were instrumental in the formation of a second privately-owned bank that had been created in America; the bank's charter was yet again canceled in the early 1830's, hence the value of the European Esquire agents who worked tirelessly to foment strife and struggle in the new Republic to the point which a civil war was all but inevitable and it was then that the Republic was officially destroyed.

The US government back then (in 1861) ceased to be a civil (de jure) government governed by the People; it became a provisional, military-based government (de facto...which means "by force") in early April 1861 under the guidance of A. Lincoln, no less. And guess what, Lincoln had a Title of Nobility and he understood clearly what the European Powers That Be wanted--never mind the cabin-living Abe of folklore...that's BS. The real Lincoln is SO opposite the historically-portrayed Lincoln that is like night and day. Lincoln's first act was to create the very first E.O. (Executive Order) to create a standing army--something which our Founding Fathers worked very hard to avoid. The provisional, military-based de facto US government of 1861 was formally chartered into a corporation in 1871 by Congress--a body politic that was NOT acting under the People, but their creators, the European bankers under the same names as the original American Republic, i.e. the original Republic was "united States of America" (note the uncapped "u") , whereas the European-banker-controlled USA was "UNITED STATES of AMERICA" (note that the ALL-CAPS denote the legal-fiction nature of the reconfigured USA, INC).

So with that standing army--financed by the European bankers, no less--known as the "Union Army" waged an unlawful war against the South, who had many legitimate grievances against the North that had been massively manipulated by the European bankers through their Esquire agents (but the slavery was not a legit South grievance, though). That war--the Civil War--did not "preserve" the Union--it destroyed it and created a dominance of the European banker's way of doing things and paved the way for the eventual creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 through the Federal Reserve Act, acted on Christmas Eve, 1913, after nearly everyone (Congressmen/Senators) had gone home, save for a few who were in the know and who remained to pass the unlawful Act with a just-large enough quorum to make it effective.

So the real creators of the money that we use today are the private bankers, not us default users of that money. Many, many people have tried to create alternative sources of interest/usury-free money to compete with the Federal Reserve, but they have met violent ends, most notably President Kennedy, who had ordered the creation of interest/usury-free money from the Treasury of the United States, rather than the private Federal Reserve notes. Kennedy was keenly aware what was up with the money-creation game, so he tried his best to put an end to the Fed, but it was Kennedy who paid the ultimate price on Nov 22, 1963.

So, yes, money as we know could be a divine creation as a neutral means of exchange of goods/services, but, the reality is that, with today's interest/usury-based debt notes, there are "prime creators" and "secondary creators" of that monetary system.

The "prime creators" are the privately-owned central bankers (i.e. Rothschilds) who issue and control the monetary system that is used by the "secondary creators", who use that interest/usury-based money by default. The prime creators create the money in the name of the People, who are the secondary creators, who are *forced* to use none other than the "official" legal tender, the Federal Reserve Notes.

It is the prime creators who benefit from this system massively with their massive concentrations of wealth, to the point which some 40%+ of all wealth is now concentrated in the hands of well less than 1% of the population. The prime creators are the ones who decide what wars are fought and when; it is the prime creators who decide who gets what money when, i.e. the military-industrial complex getting the money first at the expense of the secondary-creator solders upon whom the entire complex rests; billions for bombs while the injured solder casualties have to deal with red-tape bureaucratic delays while dealing with rats running over their festering wounds, the paint falling off ceilings, the mold choking their lungs at Walter Reed Hospital, a flag-ship military hospital that is run by the super-wealthy military-industrial complex, to point out just one example of the avarice of today's primary creators at the expense of the secondary creators. It is the prime creators who decide who gets elected and who can say/do what at their bidding.

There have been quite a few secondary creators who realized what the money game as currently constructed was all about, but each one of them have met violent ends (i.e. killed, arrested, imprisoned, etc) at the hands of the programmed mercenary police forces (local SWAT teams, state police, etc) under the orders of the primary creators, PTBs, who run America...and the world. The primary creators create their power through the marriage of the fiat interest/usury-based notes and the brute power of police forces (paid for with the fiat notes) at the barrel of the gun.

Fiat money and brute force...two sides of the same coin that is created by the prime creators, the banksters, at the expense of the secondary creators, the People.

So now we secondary creators are suffering the effects of an implosion of the US economy, triggered by the Sub-Prime lending scandal--which was engineered on purpose by the prime creators--, the exporting of the US manufacturing jobs, the massive debasement of the money supply (i.e. "inflation") that is driving the cost of basic goods, like food, fuel, housing, up and beyond the reach of so many secondary creators that would create a deflationary period (monetary contraction with falling jobs, falling consumer spending, etc), followed by massive inflation (with hyper-inflation of the printing of excess money to attempt to compensate for the deflationary effects)...all this by design by the prime creators at the expense of--and in the name of--the secondary creators, the People.

Through the catalyst of the suffering of the secondary creators, it is imperative for them to realize what the monetary game is all about and to realize that THEY THEMSELVES have the SAME power to issue/control a nation's currency just like the current prime creators, sans the avarice-inspired money that is based on debt and interest/usury. The secondary creators DO have the power to create a printed money that is based on the full faith and credit of the People.

The People-based money can be created through locally-based co-op banking. It can have short-term notes (money that have tight time limits in their usability) that are backed by the secondary creators who are signatories for those notes; it can also have longer-term notes that would have gold/silver thread woven into the notes, hence they'd have automatic intrinsic value for long-term stability of the notes for long-term stability of the economies that rely on those notes to function with a high degree of stability. The money can be made secure through numerous high-tech means, like watermarking, holograms, etc.

With the People-based, interest/usury-free monetary system, the secondary creators can then be primary creators who would have the power to decide how to govern the government; how to determine how public money is used; how to control any and all corporations by controlling their charters and so on.

A case in point of the difference of money created by People v.s. debt-based notes by private bankers:

From 1793 to 1913, the time period from the founding of the Republic to the creation of the private Federal Reserve, (and this is despite the twice-created private banks in the early 1800's), the money supply in terms of 10 basic commodities (tobacco, corn, wheat, sugar, etc) that were traded consistently throughout that period of time, the prices as measured in dollars remained roughly the SAME from 1793 to 1913; meanwhile the wealth of the American Republic grew and grew by leaps and bounds. The increases of widely-distributed wealth of the Americans in the American Republic was unprecedented in world history. Never before did such a large class of People gain such large amounts of wealth and they did so because they were primary creators having full control of their wealth through the control of the monetary supply. From 1913--the fateful year of the creation of the Federal Reserve--to today (2007), the prices of the SAME 10 BASIC commodities have increased MORE THAN 20-FOLD. This massive debasement of the monetary system benefited the debt-based primary creators (i.e. the Rothschilds) at the expense of the secondary creators with the result of an imploding economy and wars without end.

So the secondary creators DO have the same inherent powers of monetization that the current primary creators (the Rothschilds)--it is just a matter of the secondary creators getting educated to the point which a critical-mass of change can happen with an overthrow of the Rothschilds' banking system and an implementation--simultaneously nation-wide--of a People-based, debt/interest/usury-free monetary system that would be created through local co-op banks that would be under the control of the People. Only then can the wars end.

Note that Rothschild cared not about any sort of laws as long as he had the power to issue and control a nation's currency. That's the key in any sort of governance--control of the money supply of a nation, you control/direct the nation's destiny.

Just like the awakening in the spirituality/metaphysical worlds can be based on not magic, nor ignorance, nor faith, but unveiled science and facts, so too can the awakening of the true, inherent powers of the People by being Primary Creators of their own money supply can be based on science and facts of monetary creation.