by Kathryn E. May, PsyD on 08/05/13
As many of you know, we are preparing to release of Prosperity Funds for the good of all humankind any day now, to free all from the grip of economic slavery. There are just a few details having to do with the Vatican bankers which need to be ironed out. They are being convinced to give up their hold on the funds to allow them to be distributed. The Pope is presenting them with an offer they can’t refuse, and as you know, he has already issued the decree allowing for their arrests, which was given a start date of September 1, 2013. That was done deliberately to give them a few weeks to change their minds voluntarily. It appears that some are beginning to weaken their grip.
Just as everyone else on Planet Earth is struggling with the old rules and standards, the Vatican officials have been steeped in centuries of secrecy and absolute financial power over the entire Western world. Most people have no idea of the enormous wealth and the civil edicts which are still in place which give the Church ownership of all the lands which have ever been held by the Crown of England, and all the lands which were allied under the Axis powers, and all the countries of South America which have adopted the beliefs of the Catholic Church. This includes nearly all of Europe and the Western Hemisphere. So, as you may have suspected, the Catholic Church is the most powerful consolidated political force on the planet.
By loosening their hold on the bank funds, the protectors of the Treasury are well aware that this would be the end to their personal power, and the end to the myth that the Catholic Church as an institution was ever a well-intended religious order. Of course, there have been many devout and well-meaning Priests, Bishops and lay worshipers, including the current Pope Francis I, but the institution in Rome has always been interested primarily in political and economic power to control the world. This is coming to an end.
Many who are not religious in their current lives are unaware of the worldwide implications of how the dissolution of the Catholic Church will affect the lives of everyone on the planet. This is the ultimate inevitability - the complete dismantling of the Church, in all its glory, pomp and wealth. It will also mean the end of the psychological and religious stranglehold it has had on its people. I can hardly emphasize enough the enormous effect this will have on freeing the minds and hearts of the people.
It may seem strange to some of you that it is I, the one who came to Earth as Jesus, who am at the forefront of this apparent attack on the religion that was ostensibly established in my name. I assure you that I would not and never have supported the establishment of any large organization which called itself “Christian.” I was opposed to the building of great temples; this was an important part of my teachings. Above all, I would never have supported teachings which were designed to enslave the thinking and behavior of any of my students.
I, Jesus, Yeshua ben Joseph, was raised a Jew. I practiced the principles and ethics I learned at my parents knees, and never left behind the essence of those teachings, which encouraged a strongly ethical and devout way of life. I was interested in expanding the limits of Judaism to create a practice based in the simple understanding that Love - the Love of Creator and of one’s fellow creatures was the only principle needed to live a good life. I taught that turning away from dogma and rote practice of any rules is the first step in turning toward God. You see, in terms of the practice of the day when I lived, I was a radical/libertarian/free thinking agitator. This is the reason why both the powerful hierarchy of the Jewish community and the Romans wanted me eliminated.
Any and all other Fundamentalist sects operating in the areas where I was teaching would have been opposed to what I taught as well, for I stood for the freedom of each individual to freely communicate with God, unhampered by any dogmatic human opinions or prejudicial ideas. I taught that there was no need for priests or intermediaries - all human beings are possessed with the innate ability to communicate telepathically with their God, their Angels, and even with their ancestors. Does this sound to you like some airy-fairy New Age extremism to you? Well, the New Agers have promoted their own misunderstandings as well. Namely, that spirituality is supposed to make you feel good, as an end in itself. I will talk more about that later.
Let us concentrate here on the first lesson I will send to you through Kathryn, who has collaborated with me in the past to write the chapter in her book called, “The Christ You Never Knew.” I am asking her now to begin presenting my teachings to you directly, in unedited, unadulterated form, unlike the documents you have had available until now. We are less limited now by the language, since more people speak English than spoke my Aramaic language 2000 years ago, and we will have more control over the translations than I did then.
I ask that these lessons be distributed unedited, without commentary, in their entirety. Any translations must be specifically authorized by me. There will be Twelve Initial Chapters, which will work together as one Book of Teachings.
As long as those standards are met, we offer them freely to the world. We also will welcome questions from readers through Kathryn and Anne DeHart. I will answer them willingly, after the first six of these messages have been thoroughly understood. This is a new phenomenon, is it not, your ability to read the “scriptures” as they are being written, in my own words. I will be here soon to affirm these words in person, but it has been decided in our Council that some preparation would be very helpful for all of you.
Kathryn, Lady Portia, has given her permission to be the scribe who will present these teachings to the world, because of our long relationship going back to the creation of this galaxy, because of her deep intuitive understanding of the concepts I will present here, and her ability to take down the words and meaning with complete accuracy. I have chosen carefully, and she has been tested to the limits of her endurance. She has proven herself steadfast in the principles of Oneness I teach, regardless of the challenges we have presented to her. I now feel completely comfortable in asking her to do this important work for Us in this historic time, and she has agreed to take on the responsibility.
Now that our introduction is complete, let us begin with the first and most important lesson I will present in these pages:
God is Love. I, Sananda, the representation of God, am Love.
I speak the words which Prime Creator has breathed into my mouth, as I will do faithfully as long as my life as a soul goes on, eternally.
No other version of my words but this one are the words of the Father directly through me. Many of the old writings have been reinterpreted or purposely distorted to serve the wishes of those in power, in order to remain in power. We must begin anew. If you wish to quote me, please use these teachings rather than old texts.
I will speak only in words of encouragement which will serve to enlighten and uplift humankind to rise above the fear, divisiveness and hatred which has been the way of life on Planet Earth for millennia.
I do not come to establish a new religion, by any name. I wish to teach The True Way - communication with God and all conscious beings in Love, Compassion, Harmony, Forgiveness, and Joy.
Any teachings which engender feelings of fear, guilt, separateness from others, superiority over any other living being, or any rift between an individual and their True Being is not the Word of God, and will not be found in my words.
I AM One with God, as you are. WE ARE ONE. This is the lesson I bring to you in Joy and in Unending Love. You are God, as I AM. We cannot be separated, because we are not separate. No physical distance, no idea or belief can keep us apart. We are destined to live in harmony and peace, in absolute Love. So be it.
I am Sananda, and I approve this message, with Joy and Hope in my heart.
Transcribed through Kathryn E. May, August 5, 2013, 2 pm. EDT
An Interesting Point...
August 7, 2013, 8:06 pm
One would have thought that it would have read as follows???...
"..Any and all other Fundamentalist sects operating in the areas where I was teaching were opposed to what I taught as well.." - food for thought, at the very least, it would seem...
August 7, 2013, 1:00 pm
.."Any and all other Fundamentalist sects operating in the areas where I was teaching would have been opposed to what I taught as well.."
This sounds like it could be a tipoff....
let me explain my thinking here, and we can see, what others think-
if they see it the same way or differently...
The quote sounds theoretical, rather than a personality who was actually there....
i refer to 'would have been'...
I think a personality that was actually there
might have said 'was, or wasn't, or some were, or many were, or all were, or none were.....
but it doesn't make common sense that a personality who was aactually there
would say 'would have been'....
to me, that sounds like those could be the way one might word the sentence and thought
if one was thinking about what it might have been like....
"Any and all other Fundamentalist sects operating in the areas where I was teaching would have been opposed to what I taught as well..."
as in '?what would it have been like"...
there appears to be a kind of 'theorizing' here, a thinking out, theorizing...
well, im interested in the other opinions of open minded readers
in this discussion about what they think about this point i pointed out....
perhaps some of you see more than i have seen,
perhaps some of you see this as i described,
and perhaps some of you see it differently.
I am very interested to hear and read people's takes on this point, as well as my own.
Thankyou, and namaste,
and i hope every one of you has a beautiful day,
is having a beautiful day...
If not, remember jesus' suggestion to 'leave your belongings behind,
and choose what you will worship... attend to'
What a lovely man,... yes?
August 7, 2013, 9:45 am
That is perfectly fine, since you are living on a free-will world...I don't see any problem with rejecting assistance. Every moment of our lives is a choice as to where we are going next.
Notice Respectfully Offered...
August 7, 2013, 9:35 am
I hereby give notice that, if, perchance, the above scenario ever materializes, here on planet Earth, then i Choose not to interact with such beings, and Choose for them not to interact with me also - so, no 'mentor' or 'light chamber' would be required, or indeed welcomed, by myself, given such a scenario ever became manifest...
August 6, 2013, 9:17 pm
"...Really? Cut-and-paste out of context? So clever...you must be very proud of your abilities....Mr. One-note-samba. Any new thoughts?... other than 'predictions not coming true...bah wah wah!'
You don't know how to comment on anything other than with endless spitefulness. I've only seen you bring up the same point again, and again and again.....your point?...that the channels bring up the same points again and again! Never heard a constructive word come from you, ever! You and Richard are a great match."
And you have the cheek to lecture Hilarion on being rude! :)
August 6, 2013, 9:03 pm
...Nobody objects to you or anyone expressing doubt about the source of these messages, I have expressed my doubt about yours as well. What I don't do is endlessly stalk your posts and continually badger you with the same sentiment...I make my point and leave it at that. However, it is improper to retort a generic intellectual point with a slander, this is just plain rude and unacceptable.
August 6, 2013, 8:57 pm
Well then, since you don't find yourself in an argument with anyone anymore, please understand that others (like myself) are not quite as far along in our work. So if an argument does develop with Pegalys or another individual, please understand it was not intended. I will do my best to keep personal comments in private channels.
I appreciate your understanding of the dynamics here.
August 6, 2013, 8:50 pm
i have no problem sharing that i feel that the messenger is not in contact with ascended master
or deity frequencies.
Doesn't mean i hate her,
but i do feel i should be allowed to express my belief,
and my experience of the frequencies within the channeling.
And now i will ask the poster to respectfully respect my opinion.
Thankyou very much.
Actually Richard, I Don't ...
August 6, 2013, 8:47 pm
Actually Richard, I don't ... no hat tipping needed!;o) I strive to see through my souleyes ... that each moment is destined / created and honor each Souls journey!
that is my personal path ...
my path here on LW.org is to keep Peace, to insure that our Site Guidelines are followed. I am always mindful that we each have Choices. We each have the wherewithal to engage or not, to attack or not, to honor or not ~
I honor your relationship with Peg ... and vice versa ... be that as it may, I would ask that if either feels the "need" to bring "personal" energy into the picture or space ... you agree to disagree and take the personal comments to your private emails.
there is a habitual energy that streams from the relationship that you have formed with one another ~ and that is fine ~ I am asking that you take the personal innuendos to a private arena! ;o) I am sure you understand!
August 6, 2013, 8:39 pm
...I am trying to abide by the site rules, and I am willing to discuss the articles I find and bring here, but it seems that it is OK for some regulars here to call the material 'rubbish' and cast constant aspersions on the channeler. If I offer my opinion on the material I am accused of being insane, and misleading innocent minds. I'm sure you have read the things I post here, they are pretty much the standard fare for this section. Even after suffering numerous verbal assaults, I am always willing to continue the dialogue on fresh footing each time. I shouldn't have to deflect these bitter attacks on my person each time, as I respect this forum highly, as you know. The fact that some material is controversial should not give any cause to attack the messenger. However, since nobody seems to be interested in maintaining the proper decorum, I am compelled to not allow myself to be degraded while I am performing what I consider to be a valuable service.
Thank you, and thanks for paying attention here today.
August 6, 2013, 8:32 pm
Arguments that develop here are never intended as such. Conversations sometimes escalate to a more intense level. It's impossible to know in advance when that will occur.
Do you ever get into arguments with anyone, anymore? If so, you'll know what I mean. If not, well... I take my hat off to you.
We will TRY to play nice.
August 6, 2013, 8:20 pm
...Really? Cut-and-paste out of context? So clever...you must be very proud of your abilities....Mr. One-note-samba. Any new thoughts?... other than 'predictions not coming true...bah wah wah!'
You don't know how to comment on anything other than with endless spitefulness. I've only seen you bring up the same point again, and again and again.....your point?...that the channels bring up the same points again and again! Never heard a constructive word come from you, ever! You and Richard are a great match.
Can We Stop This ... Please?
August 6, 2013, 8:18 pm
Can we stop this ... Please? ;o)
I understand that to a degree ... there is a "chemistry" that You both engage with one another! I see it entirely from a different perspective!
I believe debate is healthy ~ I do not feel that name calling and personal infused blatant banter directed at one another ~ is!
We use our Site Guidelines ... we are not seeking "Channel Police"! It clearly states at the top of the page ... Use Discernment ... if a Channeling does not resonate with You ... then clearly, based on this FEELING ... is it necessary to argue? Especially given the CHANNELER is neither one of you! LOL
and lest we forget ... there are Private Messages ~ this is like being on the playground and I respect and encourage engaging our "inner child" ... however, this is a tad extreme!
can we play nice ~ Please?
Thank You! ;o)
Back On Track?
August 6, 2013, 8:09 pm
Pegalys, to put into a more general form what Richard is asking clarification on:
If an Event occurs 15 years from today, and I make the statement today that "This Event will happen any day now", you'd consider my prediction an accurate statement.
If a Second Event took place in 20 years and I make the statement today that "This Second Event will occur very soon", you'd consider my prediction an accurate statement.
I'm using Event and Second Event in place of specifically-named events so that we can remove any room for avoidance on the core of the clarification request.
August 6, 2013, 7:45 pm
“You wouldn't last 5 minutes in a real debate, because your tactics would immediately be censured by any competent moderator.”
Pegalys quote from comment section of “Prime Creator on Learning to Use and Control Our "Magic Powers”
“My credibility is not the issue here, and it is irrelevant what your intellectually inbred clique thinks of me.”
I don’t think it is Richard who would be censured, Pegs. :)
August 6, 2013, 5:54 pm
How did you twist what I stated into me saying the channeling shouldn't be posted here? You've really lost it. I may disagree with the contents, and even claim it to be misinformation, but I would never suggest it not be posted.
You're getting too old for this, Captain Pegs. Take a break and relax. You're imploding... in public.
August 6, 2013, 5:47 pm
"You do what your "galactic friends" do... post misinformation and then take no responsibility for it.
I know your game, Pegs. I know your focus is on spreading the garbage you believe is truth, to the thousands of guests here at LW who never read a comment (because they are unregistered users). I know you care little about this discourse here amongst the less then 5% of LW readers who can view comments."
....and that after I essentially wasted several hours conversing with you, even though you are a no-hoper, with a totally closed mind. I could dredge up literally hundreds of your garbage hurling efforts if I had the desire to, but I try and have a normal discourse with you anyway, all the while dodging your disgusting slights.
You've Gone Insane...
August 6, 2013, 5:36 pm
What kind of insane accusation is this:
"This is a channeling website, and you have the gall to suggest someone shouldn't post channelings here?"
I would never suggest such a thing. You really need help, Pegalys.
P.S. Must be too much time in the low oxygen environment on those ships.
August 6, 2013, 5:30 pm
...You wouldn't last 5 minutes in a real debate, because your tactics would immediately be censured by any competent moderator. The only reason you get away with it here is because nobody cares about your low level of discourse, and it just isn't worth the time to correct you. This is a channeling website, and you have the gall to suggest someone shouldn't post channelings here? You are the most disingenuous person I think I have ever encountered.
August 6, 2013, 5:27 pm
You have managed to reach a new low. I thought that was impossible.
And BTW, I think few here give a fxxk about the difference between the government disclosing that ET's are here versus ET's revealing themselves. It's all huge news either way... and neither has happened yet, despite promises from your friends.
August 6, 2013, 5:21 pm
...Those are you debating points?...you are a seriously one dimensional creature. If you took the time to carefully read my comments you would understand they are on topic. I apologize if they are not phrased the way you would like to hear them, but then I am not an employee of yours, am I? You display exactly the same technique each time...if you can't come up with a proper response you try and discredit me. Cowardly! Would you classify your last lashing out as ON topic?
August 6, 2013, 5:11 pm
You are off topic... which is your usual practice to avoid answering the tough questions.
We all see what you are doing. You are fooling no one but yourself.
You do what your "galactic friends" do... post misinformation and then take no responsibility for it.
I know your game, Pegs. I know your focus is on spreading the garbage you believe is truth, to the thousands of guests here at LW who never read a comment (because they are unregistered users). I know you care little about this discourse here amongst the less then 5% of LW readers who can view comments.
Pathetic. And sad.
August 6, 2013, 4:50 pm
That little piece of avoidance by you (from answering the heart of my question) is just like what your sources do on a regular basis... and it doesn't do anything for your credibility.
I was hoping for a more sincere response. Oh well.
August 6, 2013, 4:42 pm
...You seem to confuse disclosure and revelation. It is not up to the Galactics to disclose anything, they haven't concealed anything. These web pages are bursting with information about their presence (should you chose to accept it), can you point to any documents from any official gov. source that explains what they are concealing? Of course you can't. The Galactics are not in control of when the governments plan to come clean. They will reveal everything one day, but that depends on their own schedule, and we have little control over that.
August 6, 2013, 4:08 pm
Just so I and others understand you...
If ET Disclosure occurs 15 years from today, and I make the statement today that "ET Disclosure will happen any day now", you'd consider my prediction an accurate statement.
If we see a global financial collapse in 20 years and I make the statement today that "a global financial collapse will occur very soon", you'd consider my prediction an accurate statement.
August 6, 2013, 1:38 pm
...I'm not privy to any more information than you are. I don't have an inside source other than what I see when I go inside to find my own truth. Many people go inside to find truth, and each seems to come out with a different answer, namely...THEIR truth, not necessarily THE truth. Since each seems to have a unique truth they find, and those are not always the same, it is obvious that to say THE truth is inside you is a false statement...would you not agree? Ultimately there must be some unadulterated truth somewhere, and we are all trying our best to discover it, but currently there are billions of versions of it floating around. The only thing we can deduce from this massive jumble of truths and half truths is that we are being tested to see how we process what we see. We are discouraged from using the truth that the established sources have been feeding us, because we are being guided to express our own truth...whether it is actually true or not. The question is, how much real truth can we discern this way? Discernment doesn't mean rejecting everything that conflicts with what you find inside, but using the new information to reevaluate what you feel about certain things, and adjusting that if needed. That is how you grow.
As far as the SOON issue goes, this is what I posted to another blog...
"I think it is time we all expanded our definitions of NOW and SOON, and try and understand it from a higher perspective. NOW and SOON are used in relation to a VISITATION by Galactics, which is going on NOW. Anything in the NOW means during that period. SOON means something that will occur during that period, not necessarily tomorrow, but at least before the end of the NOW time. NOW does not mean in the next instant or immediately. When the Galactics complete their mission, and return to their homes or continue to other destinations, our NOW period will end. The length of the NOW time is not a fixed time. SOON cannot be determined exactly, because it depends on our cooperation, which cannot be accurately predicted."
It is pretty clear that NOW is not an actual instant in time, because we have been hearing about the now time for years already.
August 6, 2013, 11:49 am
"As many of you know, we are preparing to release of Prosperity Funds for the good of all humankind any day now, to free all from the grip of economic slavery."
So how long is "any day now" for you? A week, a month, a year? Longer? Some of us want to understand why you continue to propogate messages from this source (and other channelings containing similar missed milestones that you have been posting for years) when past messages from Kathryn have already been proven inaccurate (in the view of many here). Here is your chance to explain to us in advance how we should be interpreting this new date of "any day now".
This is an earnest request. I hope you take it that way.
August 6, 2013, 10:03 am
...only has jurisdiction within the territory of the Vatican. The Vatican is a sovereign state, and no other entity has authority to act within it's borders. The Vatican Prison is not a penal colony, but a facility to arrest and immobilize. An arrest by the Vatican strips the perpetrator of any official functions and powers, halting any activities they may be engaged in.
August 6, 2013, 9:29 am
"The Pope is presenting them with an offer they can’t refuse, and as you know, he has already issued the decree allowing for their arrests, which was given a start date of September 1, 2013."
Sorry, couldn't read beyond this blatant falsehood. I read that letter and it clearly states that anyone working for the Vatican is ONLY subject to Vatican law. That means that they will NOT face the normal criminal justice system but rather the VATICAN justice system.
"1. The competent Judicial Authorities of Vatican City State shall also exercise penal jurisdiction over:
a) crimes committed against the security, the fundamental interests or the patrimony of the Holy See;
b) crimes referred to:
- in Vatican City State Law No. VIII, of 11 July 2013, containing Supplementary Norms on Criminal Law Matters;
- in Vatican City State Law No. IX, of 11 July 2013, containing Amendments to the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code;
when such crimes are committed by the persons referred to in paragraph 3 below, in the exercise of their functions;
c) any other crime whose prosecution is required by an international agreement ratified by the Holy See, if the perpetrator is physically present in the territory of Vatican City State and has not been extradited."
At least that is how it reads to me, I'm open to persuasion. I just can't see a Vatican Court sentence being as harsh as the normal criminal justice system.
Talk about keeping the issue indoors. So much for opening the floodgates...
Sorry I Am Not Interested
August 6, 2013, 7:04 am
since we are supposed to find the answers within i don't think we need another lecture from someone who says he is "sananda".
oh forgot, he is only preparing us for his coming.
what that means is he would like to brainwash you before he comes, so you will be prepared to worship him when he comes.
sounds more like the anti-christ than the real christ.